Quick Answer: What are the two consequences of partition of India?

Partition triggered riots, mass casualties, and a colossal wave of migration. Millions of people moved to what they hoped would be safer territory, with Muslims heading towards Pakistan, and Hindus and Sikhs in the direction of India.

What are the consequences of partition of India?

(i) After 1947 most of the population transferred from one to another in unplanned manner. (ii) Many people was killed in the name of religion. (iii) Lakh of people who managed to cross the border lived their life as refugees and in refugee camps. (iv) Thousands of women were abducted.

What were the consequences of the partition of India Class 12?

Answer: Two consequences of the partition of India in 1947 are following: There were killings and atrocities on both sides of the border. Political division of the country led to the administrative failure.

What were the consequences of the independence of India?

Not only was the country divided, but provinces of Punjab and West Bengal were also partitioned, which caused many riots and claimed many lives. Hindus and Muslims used women as instruments of power. Many were raped and looted. India and Pakistan are still healing their wounds of partition.

THIS IS FUN:  How can I get 11th admission in Mumbai?

What are two reasons for the Indian partition?

The partition was caused in part by two nation theory. Pakistan became a Muslim country, and India became a majority Hindu but secular country. The main spokesman for the partition was Muhammad Ali Jinnah.

What are the consequences of the partition?

Partition triggered riots, mass casualties, and a colossal wave of migration. Millions of people moved to what they hoped would be safer territory, with Muslims heading towards Pakistan, and Hindus and Sikhs in the direction of India.

What were the consequences of partition explain any two?

In the name of religion, people of one community killed and main people of the other community. Cities like Lahore, Kolkata and Amritsar were titled as communal zones. 2. People went through social sufferings also be forced to abandon their homes especially minorities, who took shelter in refugee camps.

What were the consequences of the partition of India Brainly?

The consequences of the partition of India and Pakistan were very severe. Lakhs of people were forced to leave their lands and villages to escape terror, violence and death. Lakhs of people irrespective of their religion lost their lives due to the violence that followed.

What were the consequences of partition explain any four?

(ii) There were killings and atrocities in the name of religion on both the sides. (iii) Thousands of women were abducted. (iv) People were forced to abandon their homes and move across the border. (v) Women were killed by their own family members to preserve family honour.

THIS IS FUN:  What are disadvantages of India?

What are the consequences of partition Class 12 Political Science?

Consequences of Partition

They were forcefully converted to other , religion. Political and administrative machinery failed on both sides. There was huge loss of lives and property. Communal violence was on its culmination.

What were consequences of Bengal partition?

Against the Partition of Bengal, Extremists organised the Swadeshi Movement and the Boycott of British goods. The partition led to the growth of revolutionaries and the agitation in Bengal against lie British Government spread throughout the country.

What was one of the immediate consequences of the partition in India?

One of the immediate consequences of the partition of India was the mass migration of Muslims and Hindus. Explanation: The partition of India was the partition of the British Raj, which resulted in the creation of the sovereign States of Pakistan and India on August 15, 1947.

What were the consequences of independence?

Political and social life changed drastically after independence. Political participation grew as more people gained the right to vote. In addition, more common citizens (or “new men”) played increasingly important roles in local and state governance. Hierarchy within the states underwent significant changes.