Is Section 144 imposed in Bangalore today?
Bengaluru: Section 144 has been imposed in Bengaluru, banning the assembly of more than four people in public. … The order was issued by Bengaluru City Police Commissioner and Additional District Magistrate. Bus stands, railway stations and airports have been exempted from the order.
WHY IS 144 in Bangalore today?
The orders come ahead of protests against the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA) which were set to be held on Thursday. “It is just a precautionary measure as we do not want violence,” Karnataka Home Minister Basavaraj Bommai said.
What are the rules of section 144?
Section 144 of the Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC) of 1973 authorises the Executive Magistrate of any state or territory to issue an order to prohibit the assembly of four or more people in an area. According to the law, every member of such ‘unlawful assembly’ can be booked for engaging in rioting.
What CrPC 144?
Key Points. About Section 144 CrPC: This law empowers the magistrate of any state or union territory in India to pass an order prohibiting the gathering of four or more people in a specified area.
Who can impose section 144?
Who has the power to impose section 144? Section 144 CrPc, 1973 gives power to a sub – divisional magistrate, district magistrate or any executive magistrate on behalf of the State Government to issue an order towards the general public or an individual in a particular place.
What is the curfew time in Bangalore?
However, prohibitory orders clamped under section 144 of CrPC will be relaxed in places like railway stations, the airport and bus terminals. Night curfew will be in place between 10pm and 5am.
Does section 144 apply to schools?
Section 144 does apply to schools, colleges, other educational institutions and government offices. These can be closed according to the order.
How many Dara are there in India?
At Present, Indian Penal Code consists of 511 section divided into 23 chapters.
What is restitution in CPC?
Restitution in relation to Civil procedure code means giving back or restoring to the person who is entitled to the benefit from the other party who has wrongly received such benefit under an erroneous decree or order of the court.